How a question reaches the claimant
Every expense system eventually has to ask somebody a question, and almost all of them ask the wrong person. They route the odd claim to a manager, who does not know why the trip was long, who then asks the claimant, who answers, who tells the manager, who approves it. Three people, two days. The person who knows the answer was in the loop the whole time and was asked last. This post is about asking them first.
Key takeaways
- The claimant is asked first. A manager only sees a claim if the claimant does not answer.
- The message carries both numbers and the route, so the question answers itself half the time.
- Three buttons cover almost everything: return trip, detour, or I typed it wrong.
- “I typed it wrong” corrects the claim rather than rejecting it. Nobody is made to refile.
- Silence escalates on a schedule: a nudge at 48 hours, a manager at five days.
Ask the person who knows
- App integration
- Management
- People
What the message says
The whole message, in order
- Line one. The trip, plainly. “Tuesday 14th, Ashford to Maidstone, call-out.”
- Line two. Both numbers, in that order. “This route looks like about 41 miles. You claimed 84.”
- The map. A small static image of the route, so the question is often answered by looking rather than thinking.
- Three buttons. “It was a return trip.” “There was a detour — here’s why.” “I typed it wrong — it was ___.”
- Nothing else. No claim reference in the subject line, no portal link, no policy reminder, and no sentence containing the word compliance.
The tone is doing real work there. “This route looks like about 41 miles” concedes that the system might be wrong, which it often is. “Your claim exceeds the permitted variance” does not, and the difference in how people respond to those two sentences over a year is larger than anything else in this design.
The three buttons, and why they are those three
- Return trip. By some distance the most common cause. One tap doubles the expected distance, re-runs the band, and pays it. No manager, no note, no record that anything was ever odd.
- Detour, with a reason. Opens a one-line box. The reason is stored on the claim and the claim is paid immediately — the reason is for the record, not for approval. A person who has to wait for their detour to be approved will stop mentioning detours.
- I typed it wrong. Opens a number box, pre-filled with the expected distance. The claim is corrected in place and paid. Nobody is made to delete and refile, because refiling is how claims get abandoned and abandoned claims become resentment.
What happens when nobody answers
Silence is the interesting case, and it is almost never dishonesty. It is a phone in a van, a person on annual leave, an email address that goes to a device nobody opens. So the escalation is slow, and it never turns into an accusation.
- App integration
- Machine learning
- Management
- Front-end & mobile
- People
That last step matters more than it looks. Plenty of expense systems expire unanswered claims at period end, on the reasonable-sounding grounds that the books have to close. What that actually does is take money off somebody who drove eighty miles for you and did not check an email. The claim is carried, it appears on the next month, and it keeps appearing until a human resolves it in one direction or the other.
Next: what happens when a claim is finally approved — the payment record, the monthly total, and the one report that makes this worth running.
All posts