Skip to content

Part 3 of 7 · Visitor check-in logger series ~5 min read

How little you need to collect

Visitor books ask for a lot and almost none of it is used for anything, which is a reasonable definition of data you should not be collecting.

Key takeaways

  • Name, host, arrival time. Everything else needs a stated reason.
  • The paper book’s worst feature is showing everybody the previous entries.
  • A photograph of every visitor is a biometric dataset with no purpose attached.
  • Thirty days is a generous retention period for a roll call record.
  • Ask for a mobile number only if you will use it, and say what for.

Field by field

FieldUsed for what?Verdict
NameThe roll callNecessary
HostThe roll call, and letting them knowNecessary
Arrival timeConfidence in the roll callNecessary
CompanyNothing, usuallyOnly if you have a reason
Car registrationParking, if you manage itOnly where parking is managed
Purpose of visitNothingDrop it
SignatureA ritualDrop it
PhotographIdentifying a visitor to staffRarely justified; see below

The middle rows are the interesting ones because they are collected almost universally and used almost never. Purpose of visit in particular is a field that people fill in with a single word and which nobody has ever read.

The test for any field is straightforward: name the situation in which somebody looks at it. If the answer takes more than a moment to construct, the field should not exist.

What the paper book discloses

How a paper visitor book discloses previous visitors to every new oneA horizontal row of five boxes. You sign in on a page. You see fourteen names above yours. And their hosts, and their companies. A competitor visited on Tuesday. Nobody intended this, and it happens daily. A note says a screen showing one entry at a time fixes this at no cost.THE VISITOR BOOK'S QUIET PROBLEMYou sign inon a pageYou see 14 namesabove yoursAnd their hostsand their companiesA competitor visitedon TuesdayNobody intended thisand it happens dailyA screen showing one entry at a time fixes this at no cost.
Fig 1. The disclosure inherent in a shared paper book. It is unintentional, routine, and fixed for free by any screen-based check-in.
  • Compute
  • Management
  • Analytics
  • Front-end & mobile
  • People

This is worth being explicit about because it is often the first genuine benefit of replacing the book, ahead of anything to do with the roll call. Who is meeting whom is frequently commercially sensitive and a shared page publishes it to everybody who walks in.

Photographs

How to decide whether to photograph visitors and what to do with itA vertical chain of five steps entered by a box labelled Take a photo of visitors, a common request. Step one asks what it is for, specifically; if unclear it exits to Do not take it, no purpose no photo. Step two considers badge identification, which is a real reason sometimes. Step three asks how long to keep it, the visit or forever; the visit only exits to deleted at check-out. Step four asks whether it is biometric, which it is if matched. Step five says do not match faces, which is a different obligation entirely. A note says a photograph on a badge for four hours is not the same as a face database.AWS ACCOUNT"Take a photo of visitors"a common requestWhat is it for?specificallyDo not take itno purpose, no photounclearBadge identification?a real reason, sometimesThen keep it how long?the visit, or forever?The visit onlydeleted at check-outthe visitIs it biometric?if matched, yesDo not match facesa different obligation entirelyA photograph on a badge for four hours is not the same as a face database.
Fig 2. How to decide about photographing visitors. The distinction in the last two boxes is the one that matters legally and practically.
  • App integration
  • Machine learning
  • Security & identity
  • Management
  • Front-end & mobile

The distinction that matters

A photograph printed on a temporary badge and deleted when the visitor leaves has a clear purpose and a short life. A stored photograph of every visitor, retained and searchable, is a different thing with different obligations, and facial matching is different again and involves special category data in most regimes.

Most buildings that ask for visitor photographs want the first one and end up building the second by default, because deletion is the step that gets left out.

Retention

The roll call needs today. An incident investigation might need last week. Almost nothing needs last year, and a visitor log going back several years is a list of who met whom that somebody will eventually ask about.

Thirty days is generous and defensible for most buildings, with automatic deletion rather than a policy somebody is supposed to enact. Where a longer period is genuinely required — some regulated environments — it should be a stated period with a stated reason, not an absence of deletion.

Mobile numbers

Useful if you are going to use them: an evacuation message, a check-out prompt, a notification that their host is on their way down. Not useful as a field that exists because the form template had one.

If it is collected, the screen should say what it is for in six words. That both justifies it and reminds whoever configured the system that it needs a justification.

Next: the part that does not work.

All posts