How the ranking report reads
A weekly report that shows different things each week cannot be skimmed, and a report that cannot be skimmed does not get read for long. This one shows the same six lines in the same order, forever, and that consistency is most of why it survives.
Key takeaways
- The same six themes, in the same order, every week.
- Each line: position, clicks, impressions, and the direction against last year.
- The page carrying each theme is named, with what share of it lands there.
- Correlations are stated as correlations. The report never claims a cause.
- One monthly addition: the top twenty unmatched queries.
The weekly page
Week ending 26 July
- Emergency callouts — pos 7.8 (was 4.1), 340 clicks (−60%), 4,100 impressions. 92% lands on /emergency-plumber.
- Boiler installation — pos 6.2 (steady), 210 clicks (−4%), 2,900 impressions. Year on year: +8%.
- Bathroom fitting — pos 11.4 (was 12.1), 88 clicks (+12%), 1,600 impressions.
- Commercial — pos 9.0 (steady), 41 clicks, 640 impressions. Below the volume floor for movement.
- Brand — pos 1.1, 520 clicks, 700 impressions. Steady.
- Unmatched — 18% of impressions. Top queries listed monthly.
Six lines, the same six, in the same order. The first one is the finding this week and it is obvious at a glance precisely because the other five look like they always do. A report that only showed movement would have shown one line, and a reader would have no idea whether the other five were fine or missing.
Naming the page
The page carrying a theme is what somebody can actually change, and the share matters as much as the name. “92% lands on /emergency-plumber” says the theme has one page and the finding is about that page. A theme spread across nine pages at eleven per cent each is a different situation entirely and the report says that too.
- Database
- App integration
- Analytics
- Front-end & mobile
What it refuses to claim
Correlation, stated as correlation
- It says: “/emergency-plumber was edited on the 21st. The position change first appears in the week beginning the 20th.”
- It does not say: “the edit on the 21st caused the drop.”
- Why: search rankings move for reasons entirely invisible from your side — a competitor’s change, an algorithm update, a new result format. Claiming causation from a timestamp is how businesses spend a fortnight reverting an edit that was fine.
- What it will say: “nothing changed on this page in the last 60 days”, which is genuinely informative and rules something out.
That restraint is not pedantry. A confident wrong cause is worse than no cause at all, because somebody acts on it. Presenting a timing correlation as a timing correlation lets a person weigh it against everything else they know, which is what they are for.
The monthly addition
- Networking
- Security & identity
- Analytics
The unmatched top twenty is a monthly rather than weekly item because it changes slowly and reading it takes five minutes of genuine attention rather than nine seconds of skimming. Putting it in the weekly report would mean it was skimmed, which would waste the most valuable thing in the system.
Next: what all of this costs to run.
All posts