Skip to content
allanninal.dev/build
Collaborate

Part 2 of 7 · Asset register keeper series ~5 min read

What the register is actually for

Almost every failed asset register failed because nobody chose between four incompatible jobs, and the fields ended up serving all of them approximately.

Key takeaways

  • Four purposes: insurance, accounting, replacement planning, and finding things.
  • Each wants a different value and a different level of detail.
  • Choose the dominant one and be explicit that the others are secondary.
  • The capitalisation threshold is an accounting question that should not set the register’s.
  • Some things belong on the register and not in the accounts, and vice versa.

Four jobs

PurposeWantsDetail needed
InsuranceReplacement cost today, and locationEnough to make a claim
AccountingPurchase price, date, depreciation methodEnough for the accounts
Replacement planningAge, condition, expected lifeEnough to forecast spend
Finding thingsWhere it is, right nowEnough to walk to it

The values conflict directly. A machine bought for eleven thousand pounds in 2019 has a book value of about four thousand, a replacement cost of maybe sixteen thousand, and a resale value of two. All three are correct answers to different questions and a single value field will hold whichever one the person entering it thought of.

The detail conflicts too. Insurance is content with a category and a count for small items; operations needs to know which desk. Recording desk-level detail for insurance purposes is effort spent on a requirement nobody has.

Choosing

How the dominant purpose of an asset register is chosenA vertical chain of five steps entered by a box labelled Why are we building this, answered honestly. Step one asks whether a claim was hard, meaning insurance leads; if so it exits to Replacement cost and photographs. Step two asks whether the auditor asked, meaning accounting leads; if so it exits to Purchase and depreciation, and disposal dates. Step three asks whether it is for capital budgeting, meaning planning leads; if so it exits to Age and condition, and expected life. Step four asks whether things go missing, meaning operations leads; if so it exits to Location and custodian, updated often. Step five states that the others are secondary, and says so. A note says most registers answer all four and therefore serve none of them well.AWS ACCOUNTWhy are we building this?answer honestlyA claim was hard?insurance leadsReplacement costand photographsyesThe auditor asked?accounting leadsPurchase and depreciationand disposal datesyesCapital budgeting?planning leadsAge and conditionand expected lifeyesThings go missing?operations leadsLocation and custodianupdated oftenyesThe others are secondaryand say soMost registers answer 'all four' and therefore serve none of them well.
Fig 1. How the dominant purpose is chosen. The honest answer to the first question usually points at one of the four, and the rest follows from it.
  • Compute
  • App integration
  • Management
  • Front-end & mobile
  • People

Secondary is not absent

Choosing insurance as the dominant purpose does not mean the accounting fields are omitted; it means they are filled at a lower standard and nobody is surprised when they are approximate.

Being explicit about that prevents the recurring conversation where somebody discovers the depreciation is wrong on a register that was never intended to drive the accounts.

The threshold

The number of items on an asset register at four value thresholdsA bar chart with four bars showing items on the register. Everything: four thousand one hundred. Over one hundred pounds: eight hundred and ninety. Over five hundred pounds: four hundred and eleven. Over two thousand pounds: ninety-six. A note says the five hundred pound register covers ninety-four per cent of the value with a tenth of the items.02000400060008000~4100Everything~890Over £100~411Over £500~96Over £2,000Items on the registerThe £500 register covers 94% of the value with a tenth of the items.
Fig 2. Register size at four thresholds. The value covered rises far more slowly than the item count does, which is the argument for a higher threshold than instinct suggests.

A register with four thousand items is one that nobody maintains, and an unmaintained register is worth less than a smaller accurate one. The threshold should be set at the point where the maintenance effort is sustainable, which is usually higher than the accounting capitalisation threshold.

That is worth stating because the two get conflated. The accounts capitalise above a figure set by policy; the register tracks what is worth tracking, and there is no reason those numbers have to match.

Things that break the threshold

Two categories go on the register regardless of value. Anything attractive to steal — laptops, phones, power tools — because tracking them is the point. And anything with a statutory inspection from Day 118, because the certificate needs to attach to a recorded item.

Conversely some expensive things do not belong: software licences, leased equipment that somebody else owns, and consumable stock which belongs in the inventory system rather than the asset register.

Next: on and off.

All posts