What the fuel data says about the vehicles
The queries are the visible output and the vehicle findings are the valuable one. Fuel consumption is a continuous measurement of how hard a vehicle is working to do the same job, which is as close to a health check as a fleet gets for free.
Key takeaways
- A sustained economy decline in one vehicle is a maintenance signal, not a driver signal.
- Utilisation findings are often larger than efficiency ones.
- Cost per mile needs unattributed fuel in it, or it is understated.
- Report per vehicle over time, never as a ranked table.
- The best outcome is a booked service, not a conversation with anybody.
Decline as an early warning
Ten per cent of a van’s fuel bill is real money, and the causes are usually cheap: underinflated tyres, a clogged filter, a dragging brake, a sensor that has drifted. All of them are found at a service and none of them announce themselves.
The output is therefore a maintenance booking rather than a conversation, which is worth emphasising because the instinct on seeing declining economy is to look at who has been driving it. In a fleet with stable driver assignments a slow decline in one vehicle is almost always the vehicle.
Utilisation
Fuel data reveals this almost as a side effect, because a vehicle that is barely being fuelled is barely being used. It is often a genuinely uncomfortable finding — the spare van that somebody insists is needed for peak weeks — and it is a question worth asking with numbers attached.
Cost per mile, honestly
Two things get left out and both understate it. Unattributed fuel is real fuel and it belongs in the fleet total even when it cannot be assigned to a vehicle. And fixed costs — insurance, tax, depreciation, the maintenance from Day 118 — are usually larger than fuel and are frequently reported separately.
A cost per mile that includes only fuel is a number that makes every vehicle look cheap and makes the utilisation finding invisible, which is exactly the finding that matters most.
What the report says
The quarterly page
- Fuel purchased: £18,400 across 214 transactions.
- Unattributed: £900, 4.9%, down from 11% last quarter.
- Queries raised: 19. Answered: 17. Data errors corrected: 14 of those.
- Vehicles with a sustained decline: 1 — van 5, down 10% over the year, service booked.
- Utilisation: van 9 covered 2,400 miles at a fully-loaded cost of £1.94 per mile.
- No driver rankings appear in this report, deliberately, and this line stays here so nobody adds one.
The third line is the honest summary of what this system mostly does: fourteen of nineteen queries were data errors. That is not a disappointing result, it is the expected one, and every one of those corrections improves the figures that produce the fourth and fifth lines.
The second line is the process metric. Unattributed fuel falling from eleven per cent to five per cent means the matching and the queries are working, and it is the number that determines whether anything else on the page can be trusted.
The line that stays in the template
The last item is a small piece of institutional memory. Somebody will ask for a driver league table roughly once a year, and a line in the standing report explaining why there is not one answers the question before it is asked, with the reasoning already written down.
Next: what all of this costs to run.
All posts